Texas Tech
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
575  Ebenether Wondaferew SR 32:59
636  Joacim Zuniga JR 33:05
891  Todd Mickey SR 33:30
1,177  Stephen Alvarez FR 33:53
1,231  Clark Blunt SR 33:58
1,337  Nathan Gift SO 34:06
1,406  Michael Benoit JR 34:11
1,903  Shea Whatley SO 34:56
1,918  Riley Gonzales SO 34:58
2,046  Matthew Munoz FR 35:13
2,078  Grant LaSelle SO 35:16
National Rank #143 of 315
Mountain Region Rank #13 of 18
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 12th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 1.5%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Ebenether Wondaferew Joacim Zuniga Todd Mickey Stephen Alvarez Clark Blunt Nathan Gift Michael Benoit Shea Whatley Riley Gonzales Matthew Munoz Grant LaSelle
Chile Pepper Festival 09/29 1082 32:50 32:36 33:33 34:10 34:03 34:13 34:23 34:52 34:55 35:20 35:06
Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/14 1114 32:59 33:07 34:10 33:39 33:39 33:42 33:53
TTU UTEP Dual 10/21 1337 36:49 34:12 35:26 34:40 36:48
Big 12 Championship 10/28 1057 32:54 32:46 33:00 33:38 33:49 33:30 33:56 34:37 34:57 35:16
Mountain Region Championships 11/10 1139 33:09 33:25 33:05 34:11 34:32 35:48 34:45





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 13.4 398 1.5 7.3 24.3 22.3 18.8 15.6 9.8 0.6



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Ebenether Wondaferew 64.6
Joacim Zuniga 67.6
Todd Mickey 79.6
Stephen Alvarez 91.2
Clark Blunt 94.0
Nathan Gift 97.6
Michael Benoit 99.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 1.5% 1.5 10
11 7.3% 7.3 11
12 24.3% 24.3 12
13 22.3% 22.3 13
14 18.8% 18.8 14
15 15.6% 15.6 15
16 9.8% 9.8 16
17 0.6% 0.6 17
18 18
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0